It doesn't feel good though. Maybe we should create a new category for Magic related companies? --MORT(T) 13:38, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
Agree with you MORT. The company MicroProse isn't Magic Product, though they sold it. --GeoMike 14:02, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
The big problem with making Magic-related companies is, there aren't that many, making it fairly pointless to even create the category. Perhaps something slightly broader so that it encompasses enough articles to be justifiably used? MM(talk!) 14:12, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
Thought I'd search for "Harperprism", thought they might have their own page but they are on the promotional cards page. Maybe Microprose shouldn't have its own page, instead the software title would be the page name. Then it would be "Magic Product". --GeoMike 14:58, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
I think it should have its own page. And that category for such companies should be created. Small number of articles is not a good reason for not creating a new category IMHO. Besides, it won't be even that small nubmer - there will be MicroProse, Harperprism, Acclaim/Akklaim, ARMADA, and maybe Hasbro too. --MORT(T) 15:04, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
Good point. --GeoMike 15:41, 18 November 2007 (GMT)
"Magic product". Okay, perhaps it's time to create the Category:Magic-related companies category, but I don't like the sound of companies - is it accurate enough a term? MM(talk!) 11:13, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
Yeh, okay, Wikipedia says companies; so be it then. MM(talk!) 11:14, 19 November 2007 (GMT)
This page was last edited on 19 November 2007, at 11:14.
Content is available under CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted. Game content and materials are trademarks and copyrights of their respective publisher and its licensors. All rights reserved.
This site is a part of Fandom, Inc. and is not affiliated with the game publisher.