Archetypes[]
I am wondering if we should add that list of limited archetypes under "Themes and Mechancis" in the somewhat established format of other sets like the Masters Sets and Origins. Was a big fan of that :D Here they are named only with the 2-color uncommon cards (signposts) under "Cycles". --Sulzram (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm all for it! --Hunter (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Good idea. We often list the draft archetypes in the Cycles, but it makes more sense in the Themes and Mechanics section. - Yandere Sliver
12:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nice. I like the uncommons in brackets here to give people an idea what the archetype is all about in addition to the wiki link (especially for things that are a bit abstract like "attrition"). These list are an enormously useful resource for cube builders like me who are often looking for archetypes for specific guilds. ^^ Also these uncommons are only a cycle in the loosest sense of the word. --Sulzram (talk) 12:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. We can go the same thing in a lot of other sets. which I do think is a real improvement to the wiki.
- I think it makes the most sense to work backward from C19. - Yandere Sliver 13:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nice. I like the uncommons in brackets here to give people an idea what the archetype is all about in addition to the wiki link (especially for things that are a bit abstract like "attrition"). These list are an enormously useful resource for cube builders like me who are often looking for archetypes for specific guilds. ^^ Also these uncommons are only a cycle in the loosest sense of the word. --Sulzram (talk) 12:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Good idea. We often list the draft archetypes in the Cycles, but it makes more sense in the Themes and Mechanics section. - Yandere Sliver
Name[]
Name seems to have changed from Core 2019 to Core Set 2019. Shall we change accordingly? --Hunter (talk) 13:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hmmm... It is a Core set and gets the number 2019. The product page still calls it Core 2019. So I am not sure if that was a slip up. I would just wait for now. - Yandere Sliver 14:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- This settles it: http://news.toyark.com/2018/02/17/toy-fair-2018-hasbro-magic-gathering-288666#images --Hunter (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems about right... Only thing that really surprised me was the Tezzeret Planeswalker Deck with Jace inside. Is that a miss-package? - Yandere Sliver
11:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems about right... Only thing that really surprised me was the Tezzeret Planeswalker Deck with Jace inside. Is that a miss-package? - Yandere Sliver
- This settles it: http://news.toyark.com/2018/02/17/toy-fair-2018-hasbro-magic-gathering-288666#images --Hunter (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Why revert my edit?[]
so replace 18th with eighteenth.